Latest Entries »

SLIME

 

At the risk of treading on even more toes than I have, I decided to relay some song words which often pop up in my mind (no pun intended). They will speak for themselves. Hoping not to infringe copyright laws, I must quickly say that all the praise goes to the author, Frank Zappa. The song is from the album “Over-nite Sensation”. I don’t recommend the album to you as it’s pretty raunchy (and he later saw a need to mock the Church), but I must say that Zappa was a tremendously talented man. He had an acute sense of humor, was extremely creative musically- as opposed to repeating masses of cliches as most ‘artists’ do – and was a fantastic and innovative guitarist. His lyrics, when not raunchy, were always meaningful and imaginitive.

“I’M THE SLIME”

I am gross and perverted, I’m obsessed and deranged

I have existed for years but very little has changed

I’m the tool of the government, and industry too,

For I am destined to rule and regulate you

I may be vile and pernicious, but you can’t look away

I make you think I’m delicious with the stuff that I say

I’m the best you can get, have you guessed me yet?

I’m the slime oozing out of your TV set

You will obey me while I lead you

with the garbage that I feed you

Until the day that we don’t need you

Don’t go for help: no-one will heed you

Your mind has been controlled

It has been stuffed into my mold

And you will do as you are told

Until the rights to You are sold

(That’s right folks-don’t touch that dial!)

THE SPARROW FALLING

One day recently I was driving a large vehicle at considerable speed, when two small birds – swifts – flew across the road in front of me. One of them managed to avoid the truck but the other didn’t. I heard a little thud from the body of the truck over me.

As before when I’ve hit birds while driving, I felt hurt and sad. I have a lot of respect for them. They work with all their might just to survive and raise their young successfully. At some point in the past  I had to harden myself to this kind of event, since I do a lot of driving, and it’s impossible to miss them all.

However, I had to say to the Lord, as I have many times before, “Lord, you could have prevented that from happening – why didn’t you?”

This little prayer led me to wonder how many other things happen that God could stop but doesn’t. I recalled a part of Matthew’s gospel, where Jesus talks of falling sparrows. I’m going to pluck a verse out of its immediate context here, bounce it a around a bit, and then put it back in place:

“Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground apart from the will of your Father” (Matthew10:29).

On the day I hit that swift, it occurred to me, as never before, that the sparrows Jesus spoke of do actually fall. He didn’t say that when the sparrows fall, God stops them half way down and restores them.

We live in a fallen world where things go wrong in everyone’s lives. Even those with the greatest faith have troubles and disasters. The mortality rate among humans is very nearly one hundred percent (taking into account the Elijahs of the world). We react when things go wrong as though God has let us down, and maybe isn’t there at all. Was he looking the other way, and failed to see what was happening? Does he not like us? Did we do something wrong?

But when we consider the whole of Scripture, and not just the parts we want to make use of for our own material enrichment, we find that trouble is a prescribed part of life for every one of us. God said to Adam (and so to mankind), “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life… until you return to the ground…” (Genesis 3:17b – 19). Job said “man is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upward” (Job 5:7). Even the greatest of Biblical characters endured hardship and suffering, including Jacob, Joseph and Paul, and of course the Lord Jesus, the Son of God himself.

God doesn‘t promise to make this life perfect for us. To perpetuate this world God would be perpetuating a hell on earth, where the violent, the selfish, the greedy, the immoral, the thief, the arrogant, and the God-haters thrive and make a mockery of Creation.

“Jesus said “In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33b). It is for the life to come, without sin or decay, that we who have accepted the Son of God as our Savior, have the promise of perfection and freedom.

So to get back to the original question, why doesn’t God stop the sparrow from falling?  My point here is illuminated by extracting a significant part of the Matthew verse above:

“…apart from the will of your Father.”

God allows a fallen physical universe to continue – for now. He sees all that happens, even the sparrow that falls to the ground. If he sees fit to stop it, for his purposes and not ours, he will. If the sparrow falls to the ground, it is in accordance with the will of God. If  His will and concern extends to the fate of a single sparrow, then it certainly extends to us. Nothing can happen to us that’s outside of his will and purposes.

Now, putting this verse from Matthew back into its context (the entire chapter) we find that Jesus was talking to those who were sent and would be sent out with the gospel message, finding that persecution against them is common. He told them, “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both body and soul in hell (Matthew10: 28).

We attach all importance to this temporary body of ours, as though it would be eternal if only we could get the world around us to treat us the right way. But Jesus, putting our current existence  into perspective, relegates our earthly lives below the importance of our eternal life and that of others.

THE THEORY

Most of us have been told for decades that the Miller experiments proved how life originated in that primordial soup (you know –Darwin’s favorite food). In the 1950s Stanley Miller, Harold Urey and a team experimented on the elements that “must have” existed in abundance on the early earth, (Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen and Hydrogen, and then later on Hydrogen Sulfide), by zapping them and their compounds with electricity. Of course, lightning had to be involved in the creation of life, as even Frankenstein himself knew, well before Miller came along (!) That’s strange: I always thought electricity and lightning destroyed life…

Miller and the boys produced some amino acids, some of the chemical building blocks of life. While many believed that they actually produced life in a test tube (when it had allegedly taken nature many millions of years), they were in fact no nearer to producing life than you would be to producing a space shuttle if you managed to extract or produce some plastics, ceramics, copper, glass, steel, and so on. Even then, the space shuttle can’t reproduce its own kind.

A few years ago, Jeffrey Bada, a biochemist in California inherited the very vials that Miller had used, and began to conduct more experiments on the residue, enthusing that he had found more amino acids in trace amounts. They in fact found a total of 23 amino acids, ten of which are found in life. Bada and a team continue to work on these experiments, in the hope of finding more clues to the origin of the first life on earth.

http://www.icr.org/article/historic-primordial-soup-study-yields/

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=33160

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2011/03/26/news-to-note-03262011

It struck me that for decades millions of people have been convinced by school text books and television documentaries (and not any visible evidence) that Miller had virtually given birth, “proving” that we all crawled out of the soup via fish-like, lemur-like and ape-like creatures.

THE TRUTH

I’ve reviewed Ben Stein’s movie “Expelled” before, and I highly recommend it to anyone who is really seeking some truth. In Expelled, released October 2008, Stein exposes some of the strong arm tactics being employed to shut out of science, education and the media not only anyone who may believe in a Creator, but anyone interested in Intelligent Design (the search for design in nature without putting God into the equation), or even anyone who wants to question the Darwinian explanation of evolution.

I want to draw your attention to one of the most striking parts of the movie. The layman can easily miss the significance of it, and I missed most of it on my first viewing.

Towards the end of the movie, Stein interviews the great Richard Dawkins, and gives us all a fabulous glimpse into the mind of one of the world’s leading evolutionists. Dawkins begins by reading from his book “The God Delusion”, and proceeds to call the Judeo-Christian God (not Allah, of course) all the names you wouldn’t dare call Adolph Hitler or Idi Amin, even now.

Stein asks Prof. Dawkins (for all of us to see and hear) how the process of the origin of life started.

Prof. Dawkins: “Nobody knows how it started…we know the sort of event that must have happened for the origin of life”.

Stein: “What was that?”

Prof. Dawkins: “It was the… origin of the first self-replicating molecule.”

(Wait a minute, I thought, we have just made a leap from nothing but soup to the first self-replicating molecule).

The conversation continued…

Stein: “Right. And how did that happen?”

Prof. Dawkins: “I’ve told you, we don’t know”

Stein: “So you have no idea how it started?”

Dawkins: “No, no, nor has anybody.”

Prof Dawkins then goes on to suggest that some remote and highly evolved civilization out there in space may have “designed a form of life which they then seeded onto perhaps this planet”.

So here, a man who doggedly resists Creationism and Intelligent Design, and who says that the evidence for evolution is “totally overwhelming”, is offering his speculation (and not evidence) that life on earth may have been “designed” and “seeded”. He is also admitting that apart from this neither he, nor anyone else, knows how life began.

If it had indeed been “proven” that life evolved in the soup, as hundreds of millions of people have been led to believe, then Prof. Dawkins would not be giving such answers: he would be trumpeting the results.

“Expelled” is a must see movie for the seeker. I’m told that a few atheists will give such productions a one-star rating in order to lower the overall rating as much as possible, so don’t be put off: the low cost of the movie is fantastic value, if only to see the interview.

 http://www.amazon.com/Expelled-Intelligence-Allowed-Ben-Stein/dp/B001BYLFFS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1336625708&sr=8-1

There are plenty of words which have almost passed out of use in the English language since I was a boy. Those words include “humility” and modesty”. At my school these were important words to understand and important principles to put into practice.  Deference and mutual submission were common, whether in the sacred or secular worlds. We were taught to open a door for a female or for elders and let them go through first. Someone who was vain was an oddity and was made light fun of. Someone who intentionally made themselves look sexually provocative was frowned upon as being immodest and loose.  Someone who boasted of their abilities, posssessions and achievements was a “big head”.

It’s no longer desirable to be modest or humble; in fact we are encouraged to be quite the opposite, especially by advertisers. Our heroes are strong in mind and body. They’re confident and arrogant. They want to flaunt what they have. They’re successful. They don’t stand for any nonsense. They’re beautiful and sexy, and we are being led to think that if we are not at least trying to be the same way, we are of little value. The mood of the day is self exaltation in any way possible.

 

The Oxford Dictionary defines “humble” as follows:

1 having a modest or low opinion of your own importance

2 of low rank

3 not large or important

The word “modesty” is a synonym for “humility”.

I’ve been disappointed to find that if Christian ministers do ever mention humility, which is rare, they’ll skirt around the meaning, because the meaning is very unpopular, and goes against the grain of our western society. I’ve heard a few say that humility is not about putting yourself down, and it’s not allowing people to walk over you, and it’s got nothing to do with weakness. Instead, they say, it’s a sort of “quiet strength” and an inner confidence. I agree that all believers need to have an inner confidence which comes from faith in the will, power, and goodness of God. If God is for us, who can be against us? But this should go hand in hand with real humility.

Paul encouraged the Philippians to imitate the humility of Christ (Philippians 2: 1-11). What did that look like to Paul?

He wanted them to be like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and purpose (verse 2). That means a genuine (not a Sunday morning) love for each other: treating one another as equals.

He wanted them to “do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit (v 3a), but to consider others better than themselves (3b). He wanted them to be concerned about the interests of others, and not just about themselves (v 4).

Paul then went further, by giving Christ as the perfect example of humility:

“Who being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death – even death on a cross” (verses 6-8).

So we see that Jesus, though he was God in the flesh and had the right to parade around and vaunt himself,  instead “made himself nothing,” and lived his life as a servant to others. He didn’t go around boasting about who he was, and he didn’t look for public acclaim, and he wasn’t interested in being sexy or having hundred (or 200) dollar hair styles. In fact, Isaiah said that “He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by men…” (Isaiah 53: 2-3).

I’m not saying that it’s wrong to look good, but the present day obsession with appearance and image, even in some Christian circles, is not godliness. It’s up to each one of us as believers to imitate Christ, not what we see on TV.  

Of course humility doesn’t just relate to what we look like, but far more importantly it’s about obedience and submission to our Father, and recognition of our spiritual condition. You see, if we go around thinking “I’m better than that person over there”, we are calling the sacrifice of Christ unnecessary, because “all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” (Romans 3: 23) and “there is no-one righteous, no not even one” (Romans 3:10). Without Christ we are all lost and separated from God, no matter what our income, our occupation, or our appearance.

Didn’t Christ say that the first will be last and the last first (Matthew 19: 30)? Why then would we want to be considered “first” in this world? Didn’t he say that “he who exalts himself will be humbled” (Luke 14:1)? Why then would we want to exalt ourselves?

 I find that when I realize I’m thinking too much of myself, or thinking too little of someone else, it helps to pray something like this:

“Lord, I am no better than anyone else, in fact I’m as guilty as anyone else, and I’ve failed you in so many ways.  I’m probably the most sinful man I know – please have mercy on me, and forgive me for what I was thinking, and please bless that other person”.

It’s not wrong to recognize sin in the world and gently and lovingly point it out. However, admitting my own spiritual condition to myself and to God brings me down to the level of others in my mind and in my actions, and brings others up. I realize that Christ loves them as much as he loves me.  Now it’s easier for me to love them.

If you haven’t noticed, there’s a huge movement on to completely secularize all of western society and culture. As an example (and many people in Europe who think that the US is a “Christian nation” still don’t know this), prayer was banned in public U.S. schools in the early 1960s. Have you noticed a great improvement in the well being and quality of young people for it? Efforts continue to outlaw any mention of God in schools, and it’s the Christian God who takes the rap – Islam is the order of the day, and my son is currently being taught about the benefits and history of Islam. Atheists are happy for Islam to come in because it helps to dilute Christian influence in society.

Not content with mocking and degrading the Christian faith in their classes (as most universities and colleges do),Vanderbilt University recently banned the right of a Christian club within the university to choose Christians only as its leaders. Subsequently, a large number of atheists joined the club and then voted that it should be disbanded. At least sixty other universities are considering similar tactics, and Vanderbilt regards itself as the “tip of the spear” in anti-Christian policy making: so much for tolerance and non-discrimination.

http://aclj.org/free-speech-2/battle-vanderbilt-goes-national

Secularists are also going so far as having Christmas trees or any religious displays removed from all public places by suing cities and states. They have crosses removed from military graveyards. They want to deny a soldier’s right to have the chaplain speak to him about Jesus. They legally defend schools which chastise or suspend students for wearing Christian clothing or writing about Jesus instead of the latest movie star.

According to groups such as the ACLU crosses, Christmas trees and the like in public places are “offensive”, and a “violation of the wall of separation of church and state”. Such a phrase was not written into the constitution but in a private letter from Thomas Jefferson to a church:

http://www.postbulletin.com/news/stories/display.php?id=1490815

The so-called “establishment clause” was not an attempt to ban religion from public life, since many of the founders were Christians and theists, but to prevent government from becoming a theocracy (a good idea), and to protect the free practice of religion. Instead atheists are using the establishment clause to attempt to beat Christianity into a little corner, where some of them would like to finish it off completely.

The Establishment Clause, in the First Amendment of the Constitution, states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”.

The “Free Exercise Clause” continues:  “…OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF”.

THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR

In schools, colleges, and universities, and in almost all public media, there is a determined and organized effort to force feed us all-particularly our children- with the notion that they are just another form of animal like worms or mice or pigs.

 http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/IndoctriNation-public-schools-documentary,6945,229.aspx

A few billion years ago there was a rock, then rain started to fall on the rock, then, against all odds, a little bit of low-life started wiggling around and eating stuff (where did that come from?) and having babies (with who?) and changing into other animals and well, here we all are, no more valuable than that first low life. By the way, did you know that animals resembling cows, or goats, or hippos, or deer, or wolves evolved into whales? If that doesn’t seem like totally ridiculous nonsense to you, then I’d say you are too far gone – I can’t help you.

http://h2g2.com/dna/h2g2/A1283186

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/03/4/l_034_05.html

http://www.icr.org/article/scientific-roadblocks-whale-evolution/

http://www.icr.org/article/flipper-mans-best-friend/

 

 

 

NATURALISM

Naturalism is the insistence that all of nature consists of and is solely originated by matter and energy – oh, and chance and coincidence. Science is literally governed now on this principle. All that we are and all that we observe can and must be explained by purely natural processes: Divinity must not come into any part of our consideration or studies. Any scientist attempting bring the supernatural into his equations will be ridiculed and ostracized.

God is also out of a job. In fact God, in contrast to wolves turning into whales, and dinosaurs turning into ducks, is a totally contrived concept. We know that, you see, because we can’t see any little old man sitting up there in the clouds, even with a powerful telescope. He doesn’t jump when we say “hop God”, and after all, we are the supremely intelligent ones, and know everything about the entire universe. Now if only we could cure cancer and heart disease and diabetes and violence and malaria and mental illness and birth defects and… death.

Death, to the adherents of naturalism, is extinction. Your personhood will cease to exist, and your body will turn back into chemicals. Death is a vital component of the evolution of life! Bye-bye everybody!

Love is just a matter of chemicals and energy acting on our bodies. Next time you’re with your wife or girlfriend and she asks if you really love her, tell her that you are experiencing some chemical reactions, and as long as they continue you will stick around.

Not all secularists are atheists, but they’re on the same team. Neither are they necessarily bad people. Some of them believe they have only the best motives for the future of mankind. John Lennon summed up the views of a large section of his and later generations, in his song “Imagine”, still sung and sighed over as if it’s some kind of a hymn or anthem, except that Lennon counseled the removal of religion from our consideration, so that we can end all war and “live as one”. Ahhh!

That’s a nice sentiment, but it’s hard enough to get three people to agree on what to have for dinner, let alone expecting seven billion people to agree on all things and live in love and harmony. Lennon, who sang “All You Need Is Love”, shortly thereafter fell out with McCartney, and what was arguably the most popular, creative, and successful band of the 20th C fell apart. Lennon’s own son felt neglected by his father, saying that the peace and love which John talked and sang about “never came home”:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1058638.stm

 Such is human nature, and so goes the chances of universal love without God. I’ll agree that universal peace and love is worth working for, but we’ll never get there by ignoring our Creator.

In naturalism, religion is a problem which humanity needs to solve. It’s a mental illness. It limits science. Religion is dangerous. When atheists tell you that, they’re not likely to mention the fact (and neither did Lennon) that at least 130 million people died in the 20th Century as a result of the likes of Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao Tse Tung accepting the philosophies of men like Darwin. They murdered their own people. They killed those that didn’t agree with them and those they didn’t like. They killed the weak and those they considered to be “inferior”. They caused huge wars and national upheavals which resulted in the deaths of many millions more. For an example of the influence of Darwinian evolution behind mass slaughtering of humans, read this:

 http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/tj/v13/n2/nazi

http://www.fixedearth.com/hlsm.html

MORALITY

I’ve related this story before, but it serves well to illustrate my point. It concerns a young man who once told me that Christianity is “just an excuse for morality”. I wondered if he would have been happy for someone to hit him over the head, abuse his girlfriend, and steal his belongings, because morality is about having universally accepted standards of behavior which protect us from those who would hurt us individually or as a society. Animals eat each other, and feel no remorse. Is it then alright for humans to eat each other? Surely if we are just animals it is, particularly if we are hungry and need to survive.

If we are poor and can’t pay all our bills, is it alright to steal? Surely, if we want to be true to evolution and if we want to survive, there is nothing wrong.

Where do we get our sense of right and wrong from? The atheists would have us believe that it has evolved with the human race. Alright, then why is there any crime? Why is there murder and theft? Is it because those who commit such acts are not so highly evolved as the rest of us? What about those nations where bands of people go around blowing other people into eternity – are they less evolved than we are? What happened to millions of years?

Darwin plainly taught that some races of men, particularly black people, were not as evolved as others, and referred to some as “savages”. This belief continued into the 20th century. As an example, you can read about the life of a pygmy man who was put on display (while still alive) in the US as a specimen of human evolution:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/orob/darwins-plantation

GOVERNMENT

Who decides what is right and wrong? Who sets the standards? Who writes our code of ethics? If it’s not God who should decide what is good or bad for us, then we must do it. But when I say “we”, which “we” can I mean, because I find that I have no influence or power over my culture at all?

Is it the majority who should decide? If so, what about the minority? If the minorities should decide, as they often do these days, then what about the majority? It’s human nature to think that everyone should think our way, but what if they don’t? Increasingly, it’s our government which is dictating to us, by law, what we can do and cannot do, when we can do it, and how much we have to pay for it. Our government decides what is right and what is wrong. It has become our supreme power. There is no higher standard to refer to, or to hold the government to, but what they deem is right or wrong and then pass into law.

In order to illustrate the dangers of thinking that nothing guides us or makes us but matter, I’ll employ a little hyperbole here. In Taking our thought one step further, suppose we find ourselves with a government which doesn’t hold to the same code of ethics that we do. Suppose we suddenly have a government and a leader such as Germany had in the 1930s, and that a majority of the population is swept up in its philosophy. Who’s to say that we are right and they are wrong? The politicians, as your supreme power, have the right, in a world which lives and evolves by the survival of the fittest, to impose their views on you, and if you revolt violently, you are setting evolution back. If they send out the troops ans start shooting, are they not just ensuring that the fittest survive?

We may say that our culture is evolving its own set of ethics in which everyone will be treated equally (as they were in Bolshevik Russia for example). But what if some culture on the other side of the world evolves a different set of ethics, and refuses to live by yours? Suppose that one of the large religions of the world decides to move in on your part of the world, and change the way you live and think: is it not just a question of which way of life should dominate, because no-one can claim that their way of life is the “right one’? You may choose peace, but they may choose war and tyranny. Who’s to say that you are right and they are wrong?

 

 

 

 

Let’s take this to a personal level. If your wife or husband, boyfriend or girlfriend decides to leave and live with someone else, how can you even question what they are doing? They are living by their animal instincts, which tell them that in order to best thrive and prosper they need to live with someone they are more attracted to and who has more money than you. How can you complain? They are merely living out what you believe in – adaptation and the survival of the fittest. Now we are heading into a society where nobody wants to be committed to anyone unless that commitment benefits them: a society where nobody can be trusted, and where love is just a feeling – a chemical reaction which doesn’t last.

Imagine a future government deciding that only people under the age of thirty should be allowed to live. All others are no longer considered “attractive” or sexually desirable, so there is no more use for them. Not only that,  but babies are now produced in a test tube only, since in this way all offspring produced will possess the desirable IQ and good looks. Any not meeting the standards are thrown away. Is this not just humanity aiding the process of human evolution?

If your government were to do such a thing, there is nothing you can do about it, since they are in power and you are not. They are the fittest and you are just a weakling who should bow out-die- and allow the world to evolve.

THE EASY OPTION

It makes a lot more sense to me to acknowledge the obvious – that there is a Creator who knows how we can best thrive and how we are most likely to live in peace and love. “For best results, follow the Maker’s instructions”. The commandments in the Bible are not a set of principles designed to spoil our fun, but to protect us from fallen human nature. Doesn’t “Do not murder” sound like a pretty good idea? Likewise, “Do not steal” is a principle we wish everyone would hold to, particularly when it comes to our stuff. “Do not commit adultery” is designed to stop someone from using your wife for his pleasure, not to stop you from enjoying life. “Love your neighbor as yourself”. “Love your enemies”. Forgive one another”. ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with your soul and with all your mind” This is a simple, God given recipe for success.

By rejecting even a mention of God, we already see devastation all around us in broken homes, homeless and damaged children, disease, lonely and rejected people, crime, violence, greed and poverty, and prejudice. Our sense of community has gone. Our love and commitment has gone, our sense of meaning and purpose has gone, our prosperity has gone, and now it’s every man (and woman) for himself.

The God of the Bible has laid out His standards and recommendations for us. Acknowledging Him, and living by those standards can bring peace and love and commitment, and there is no other way.

JERUSALEM AND YOU: CHOOSE WISELY

 

Take a look at the map above. If you can spot tiny Israel at all, dwarfed by all the surrounding lands governed by Moslems, you will see how disproportionate is the opposition to its existence. I say “existence” because Islamic leaders, including Palestinians, frequently speak of their determination that Israel should be driven into the sea, or “wiped off the map”. Here’s a report on one example of such pronouncements:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/

To locate Israel in this map, refer to the one at the bottom.

In my country of origin, the United Kingdom, it’s become fashionable to blame all the problems of the Middle East on Israel. Neo-Nazis and other anti-Semites even go so far as claiming that all the political and economic problems of the world are caused by Zionists and Jews. I’ve heard some of them say it myself – perhaps you have too.  Anti Semitism did not die with Hitler, it just took a back seat for a time.

Here’s a rather enlightening quote from the Hadith, a collection of phrases attributed to Mohammed:

“The day of resurrection will not arrive until the Moslems make war against the Jews and kill them, and until a Jew hiding behind a rock and  tree, and the rock and tree will say: ‘Oh Moslem, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!’” (Sahih Bukhari 004.52.176)

The Koran does not contradict the Hadith:

“Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends” (Surah 5:51).

And here’s some rather unfashionable advice from the Koran which seems to escape the media’s attention:

“Men take authority over women…As for those who are disobedient, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” (Surah 4:34).

Of course, anti Semitic views are not confined to Moslems or to the United Kingdom - they are worldwide. It’s fashionable for the news media, for colleges and universities, for many politicians, celebrities, and the people on the street to take sides against Israel. The United Nations regularly condems Israel for defending itself, and wishes to diminish its power in any way possible.

I don’t intend to go through the history of Israel, Islam and the Middle East here, except to remind you (or perhaps you’ve never been told) that  Israel was last removed from its land by the legions of the Roman Empire under Titus, in the first century AD. Josephus estimated that the Romans killed over one million people in the process, ploughing Jerusalem into the ground, and then renaming the land “Palestina” as a final insult to the Jewish race, since Israel’s nearby enemies for centuries had included the Philistines. There has never been a nation called “Palestine”, and no other nation has had Jerusalem as its capital except Israel. Israelites wandered the earth since the first century, being hounded and persecuted wherever they went. The last significant persecutions, perpetrated by Hitler and Stalin, caused Israelites to seek their own homeland after WWII, in the hope of avoiding any future genocidal attempts against them. Fulfilling Bible prophecies, they founded the new nation of Israel, and have been growing in population and economic success. People of Jewish descent have been moving into the land from all over the world.

The terrible history of the Jewish nation, struggling for its very survival, as well as its future, was prophecied well before and during the time of Christ. In fact, the Bible speaks clearly of events still to come which will affect the whole world, centred in the nation of Israel.

  The current ”peace process” calls for the division of Jerusalem, and for Israel to become even smaller, so that it would be shrunk to nine miles wide at its narrowest point, and fifty at its widest. A space this small would be impossible to defend agoinst the many surrounding nations committed to Israel’s destrution. Islam now (and not in the past) claims that Jerusalem and the land “occupied” by Israel belongs to them.  Jerusalem was not mentioned once in the Koran, but is mentioned 800 times in the Bible. Jews established Jerusalem as their capital three thousand years ago. 

This opposition has been prophecied in the Bible. Not only so , but the Bible speaks of a time, just before the return of Christ to the earth, when Israel’s neighbors, with the help of “all nations of the earth” will make one last almighty effort to remove the Jewish state, particularly Jerusalem and Judah, currently known as the West Bank. The number of similarities between Bible prophecy about Israel in the “Last Days”, and the current situation in the Middle East, along with world wide anti-Semitism, is amazing. You can see some of the details below.

Please understand that I am not saying that all Israelis are good and all Moslems are evil. Many Moslems are good people, and many have found faith in Christ, despite the threat of persecution from their own people. Many Israelis are ungodly people, and the judgments of the Last Days are aimed at them as much as anyone.

  I’m writing today to suggest that you choose sides wisely in your discussions and your prayers, in the coming Middle East peace or security arrangement which will not last, and in the coming battles and wars between Israel and its neighbors. Choose wisely before and during the war of all wars between Israel and all the nations of the world (“all” implies that even the US will side with the Moslems, or just step aside). Choose wisely, because God has said to Israel, “I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse those who curse you” (Genesis 12:1-3). Choose wisely, because whoever touches Israel touches the apple of God’s eye (Zechariah 2:8). Choose wisely, because in the day that “all nations” attack Israel, and forcefully divide Jerusalem, The Son of God Himself will show up to join in the fight (Zechariah chapters 14 and 12). At that time he will not be meek and mild, but the roaring lion of Judah:

“I will gather all nations to Jerusalem to fight against it…Half of the city will go into exile, but the rest of the people will not be taken from the city. Then the Lord will go out and fight against those nations, as he fights in the day of battle. On that day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives…(Zechariah 14: 2-4).

“Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision! For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision. The sun and moon will be darkened, and the stars no longer shine. The Lord will roar from Zion and thunder from Jerusalem, the earth and sky will tremble. But the Lord will be a refuge for his people, a stronghold for the people of Israel” (Joel 3:14-16).

“In those days and at that time, when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather all nations and bring them down to the valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel, for they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land” (Joel 3:1-2).

Notice the words “my land” in that last verse. The land belongs to God, and he can lease it out to whoever He wants. Notice also the words “my people”

ISRAEL IN SCRIPTURE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE:

THE LAND OF CANAAN WAS PROMISED TO ABRAHAM’S DESCENDANTS

Genesis 12: 1-3

Genesis 13: 14 – 17

Genesis 17: 8

THROUGH THE LINEAGE OF ISAAC, NOT ISHMAEL:

Genesis 17: 18 – 21

THE PROMISE IS IRREVOCABLE – IT CANNOT BE CANCELLED:

Jeremiah 31: 35 -37

Romans 11:25– 32

Isaiah 49: 14 – 18

EXILE WAS A PART OF GOD’S JUDGEMENT ON ISRAEL’S REBELLION:

Deuteronomy 28, especially v.63 – 65

THE FIRST COMPLETE EXILE WAS TO BABYLON:

Daniel 1: 1 – 2

Ezra 5: 11 – 16

THE SECOND WAS TO ALL NATIONS:

Ezekiel 36: 16 – 19

Ezekiel 36: 3

Matthew 23: 33 – 39

THE SECOND COMPLETE EXILE WAS TO BE THE LAST:

Isaiah 11:10– 16

Ezekiel 37: 21 – 25

ISRAEL WOULD BE REGATHERED TO THEIR LAND BEFORE THE TRIBULATION:

Ezekiel 38: 8 – 9

Ezekiel 39 21 – 29

Zephaniah 2: 1 – 3

THE WASTE-LAND WOULD THEN BECOME FERTILE AND DENSELY POPULATED:

Ezekiel 36: 8 – 12

Ezekiel 36: 30 – 38

Joel 3:1-2

ISRAEL’S ENEMIES WOULD SAY THAT THE LAND WAS THEIRS:

Ezekiel 36: 1 – 7

Ezekiel 35

ISRAEL WOULD NOT BE REPENTANT UNTIL JESUS’ RETURN:

Ezekiel 36: 22, 23, 31, 32

Ezekiel 39: 21 – 29

Romans 11:25– 27

JERUSALEM WOULD BE A ‘CUP OF TREMBLING’ FOR THE NATIONS:

Zechariah 12: 1 – 10, especially 2, 3

Zechariah 14: 1 – 19, especially 2, 3

Matthew 24: 14 – 22

Revelation 16: 1 – 2

THE SO-CALLED ‘OCCUPIED WEST BANK’ IS ‘JUDAH’ IN PROPHECY:

Zechariah 12, verses 2, 6 and 7.

Zechariah 14:14

Joel 3:1

Matthew 24:15-22

JERUSALEM AND JUDAH (THE WEST BANK) WOULD BE THE DISPUTED TERRITORIES

Zechariah 12: 2-3

THEY WILL BE ATTACKED BY THE WORLD COMMUNITY, AND JERUSALEM WILL BE DIVIDED FORCEFULLY:

Zechariah 12:2, 3

Zechariah 14:2-9

THE ENEMIES OF ISRAEL TODAY WERE PROPHECIED 2500 YEARS AGO

All the nations around Israel: Ezekiel 36 – 39; Zechariah 12:2

Russia: Ezekiel 38

Iran (called Persia until 20th C): Ezekiel 38

Turkey(then Gomer) Ezekiel 38

All nations of the world – see below

ALL NATIONS WILL BE ANGRY WITH THE BIBLICAL GOD AS WELL AS ISRAEL:

Revelation 19 – 19

Psalm 2: 1 – 6

Revelation 11: 18

ALL NATIONS WILL ATTACK ISRAEL (PERHAPS TWO SEPARATE ATTACKS):

Joel 3, especially verses 1 – 2

Zechariah 12:3

Zechariah 14:2

Revelation 16: 14 – 16

Ezekiel 38: 1 – 9

THE ATTACKS WOULD BE SOON AFTER ISRAEL’S REGATHERING TO THE LAND:

Ezekiel 38:7-9

Ezekiel 39:25-27

BUT FIRST, THERE WILL BE A TEMPORARY ‘PEACE’ OR SECURITY PACT INVOLVING ISRAEL:

1 Thessalonians 5: 1 – 4

Daniel 8: 25 (esp. see the KJV)

Daniel 9: 27

Ezekiel 38: 14 – 16

THERE WILL BE A JEWISH TEMPLE OR WORSHIP CENTER BUILT AT ABOUT THIS TIME IN J:

Daniel 9: 27

Revelation 11: 1 – 2

2 Thessalonians 2: 4 – 6

Matthew 24: 15

PEOPLE WILL BE LIVING ‘NORMALLY‘ AND UNSUSPECTING, UNTIL THE TRIBULATION STARTS:

Matthew 24: 37 – 39

Ezekiel 39: 6

GOD WILL DEFEND ISRAEL AGAINST ITS ATTACKERS:

Zechariah 14: 2 – 5 and verse 12

Zechariah 12: 9

Isaiah 34:1 – 10

Joel 3: 16

Ezekiel 38: 17 – 23

Matthew 24: 30

THIS WILL BE THE END OF HUMAN RULE OVER THE EARTH:

Revelation 19 and 20

Daniel 2: 42 – 45

Isaiah 34: 1 – 4

Zechariah 14: 9 and v 16 – 19

What is the meaning of life? This question has been asked for as long as humans have been around. I’m told that in this post-modern age the question of the meaning of life is no longer an issue, since evolutionism has sucked the meaning out of it. If you are in the evolutionists’ camp, there is no meaning except survival and procreation.  I think the question of the meaning of life  is probably a non-issue for those people who are determined not to notice God at all, and who claim to be atheists, but I suspect it’s still being asked a billion times over, all around the world, every day. Perhaps the question is only asked inside minds, because it is true that looking for meaning has become unfashionable.

The Bible gives us an explanation for the meaning of life, and gives it in a very succinct, clear to understand way. We don’t need to go through life without an answer. We don’t need to go to some guru in the Himalayas, and we don’t need to ask Stephen Hawking or a computer to give us the answer (they don’t know it anyway).

In Douglas Adams’ wonderful, witty, imaginative “Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy” trilogy, which no spoof writer has yet equaled, one alien race of philosophers build themselves a super computer designed solely to find the answer to the meaning of life, and name it “Deep Thought”. After performing the necessary calculations for seven and a half million years, it finally arrives at an answer. The answer, it says, is “forty two”. The philosophers are shocked and bewildered that the answer to the meaning of life seems so meaningless. Deep Thought then offers to design a computer which can calculate what the question is.

        You don’t have to wait seven and half million years for the answer to the meaning of life. In giving the answer, I want to share with you a striking contrast I’ve noticed between the apostle Paul’s view of life and that of Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”. You may well ask what Hamlet has to do with this. Of course, he is a fictional character, but in his famous soliloquy we find one view of life and death which is very prevalent in these days, and which we may have found ourselves sharing at some time. In order to catch the drift of Hamlet’s philosophy, let’s look at a part of his speech, found in Act 3, Scene 11:

 “To be, or not to be: that is the question:

Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer

The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,

Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,

And by opposing end them?

To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end

The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks

That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation

Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep;

To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub;

For in that sleep of death what dreams may come

When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,

Must give us pause: there’s the respect

That makes calamity of so long life;

For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,

The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,

The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay,

The insolence of office and the spurns

That patient merit of the unworthy takes,

When he himself might his quietus make

With a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear,

To grunt and sweat under a weary life,

But that the dread of something after death,

The undiscover’d country from whose bourn

No traveler returns, puzzles the will

And makes us rather bear those ills we have

Than fly to others that we know not of?”

 To summarize Hamlet’s thoughts in my own very amateur way, Hamlet is extremely disillusioned with his world, and with life in general. He’s been wronged in a very significant way, and hurt by those closest to him. He finds nothing of merit within human nature. He sees life as a weary battle to fend off the evil which comes from all directions. He can’t make up his mind which is worse: to live through the troubles of life, or to die by suicide and face whatever may be on “the other side”, in the after-life. There he may wish he’d stayed in the land of the living.

Who can empathize with Hamlet? I know I can. There have been times in my life when I have had very similar thoughts. If you have not, you are very fortunate. Perhaps Hamlet speaks eloquently for many of us. It’s no wonder that Shakespeare is considered by many to be almost comparable to the Bible in his literary power, and his insights into the mind of man and human character.

However, it’s clear to all of us that this is extremely negative thinking. It’s perhaps an expression of paranoia. It’s a dark view in which there is no hope or salvation, but suffering and fear only.

PAUL

Consider now the words of the apostle Paul. When he wrote the following, Paul was chained up in a Roman jail. He lived in the knowledge that his life could be taken from him at any moment, such was the opposition he faced daily for many years, including the threat of execution. For full effect I should quote this in “King James English”, but I want it to be clear to everyone, so it’s in late 20th C NIV English instead. Notice the similarity of subject matter, but the contrast in Paul’s view of life and death:

“I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so that now as always Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death. For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labor for me. Yet what shall I choose? I do not know! I am torn between the two: I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far; but it is more necessary for you that I remain in the body (Philippians1: 10-24).

In summary, Paul, chained and one step away from execution, sees his priorities as being the exaltation of Christ, and the shepherding of those he has led to faith in Christ. Though he is always near to death, he has no fear of it. In fact, he expresses a desire to leave his earthly body so that he can be with his Lord. Paul’s wish is that he will glorify Christ: whether it is by his life, or his death, he does not mind.

Here we see the incredible faith of a man who had once been a persecutor of Christians, but who now lived for Christ and his followers.

The contrasts between Hamlet’s outlook, and that of Paul are almost breath-taking. Hamlet lives in defeat and fear: fear of life and of death. His primary, and only concern is himself and his own feelings and pride, whereas Paul can say triumphantly, “to live is Christ and to die is gain”.

To Hamlet life is just a struggle with evil and human nature, only to arrive at a fearful ending where the  the afterlife may even be worse. To Paul, life is about glorifying Christ and taking care of others’ spiritual and physical well-being, until ultimately, the believer has inexpressible joy of union with Christ. There is no loss, only gain.

In another place Paul said of Christ, “All things were created by him and for him” (Colossians 1:16). That’s the key: we were created for Him, and not for ourselves. This is the meaning of life. 

We tend to think that we’re here to get what we can out of life in the form of pleasure and stuff. We think that those who have lots of stuff must be far happier than we are. The truth is that people can be happy with very little, when they are aware of what brings true happiness. I can clearly remember my ninety-two year old grandmother, totally blind, spending most of each day alone in a room with very few possessions and nothing in the bank. She would sit and sing praise to God, with a contented smile on her face. She was waiting to be ushered into His kingdom. She was full of peace and joy, and she was a loving, kind woman without an ounce (or gram) of bitterness or fear in her. She had achieved what many or most millionaires do not.

How do you wish to feel about your life, and about death? It’s not dependent on your income, or your vocation, or who you’re dating, or what kind of experiences you’ve had. It’s dependant on your willingness to live primarily for your Creator, and also for the benefit of others, and not for yourself.

INTRO

It seems to me that there are huge numbers of people around the world who never get a chance to hear the creationists’ story of the history of planet earth. There are some fine web sites run by fine creationist organizations, but they don’t make their core beliefs or views very accessible. They fail to simplify and present the basics in an easy to find way. They are kept off of the secular airwaves except when the media takes an opportunity to belittle and misrepresent.  So in an attempt to do my small part to rectify that situation, I’m going to summarize and paraphrase a few things that everyone should have the right and chance to think over.

My first summary is on the dinosaur. Where did it come from? Where did it go? I present here the view of the Biblical Creationist, and by that I mean someone who believes that the Bible is the inspired word of God and, while it is not not a science manual, is reliable in its accounts. Other groups and individuals, attempting to compromise with the evolutionists in various ways, are causing themselves and many others untold problems with scripture as a whole, in my opinion.

DRAGONS

In the Beginning, God created all life forms within a few days. This would have included the dinosaurs. At that time dinosaurs and all other creatures were vegetarian. There was no death until Adam rebelled and sinned, causing the world to be cursed. From then on all of creation was subject to decay.

Evolutionists feel compelled to tell us that dinosaurs evolved into birds. When you look at a bird, your’re looking at a cousin to the dinosaur, or so they want us to think. Contrary to popular belief, this has not been proved.

 

          http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/did-dinosaurs-turn-into-birds

 

After the “fall of man” violence began to reign on the earth, and before long animals, including dinosaurs, were competing and killing in order to eat. Within two or three thousand years, the prevalence of violence among animals and mankind was one reason that God decided to wipe almost all life from the earth and start again.

God sent a world- wide flood. Some of the water came from the sky, where a water canopy had once surrounded the earth shielding it from harmful radiation. Some of the water came from under the ground where there was an enormous volume of water stored. The catastrophic release of water from these sources created gigantic tsunamis and turbidities which swept over large areas of the earth’s surface. The bigger, more mobile and more intelligent creatures would have been more likely to move to higher ground and avoid burial or drowning longer than smaller and less mobile creatures. The rapid movement of water, rock, sand and soil not only deposited layers of sediment all around the world (in which fossils are now found), but buried billions of creatures of all kinds, including the dinosaurs, and enormous amounts of vegetation. Some of the animals would have been still alive when buried. Animals have to be buried quickly to be fossilized. If they are not, they will decompose or be eaten and/ or scattered before they can be fossilized. Most humans may have escaped burial only to be drowned. This would explain why not many are fossilized.

http://www.icr.org/article/where-are-dinosaur-tracks-found/

Since the crust was cracking at the release of pressurized underground water, volcanic activity occurred simultaneously. Magma spewed onto the crust in some places, or filled in large cracks where the crust was twisting and moving. Mountain ranges were formed when sections of crust and enormous amounts of sediment were pushed together. Today marine fossils can be found at the tops of mountain ranges.

Upon the deluge floated an ark: a ship without sail or rudder (since it had nowhere in particular to go). Inside the ark were the last eight humans on the earth, and representatives of all animal kinds, most likely including dinosaurs. God had provided an escape for them in order to preserve life on the earth.

Once the Flood was over, and the earth’s crust began to settle, the water drained from the land causing rapid erosion, and creating gorges and valleys. Atmospheric conditions caused by volcanic activity were now such that temperatures took a plunge near the poles, causing an ice age to develop rapidly, and freezing animals such as the mammoths so quickly that they were in some cases perfectly preserved. As the ice sheets retreated there would have been more water flow and erosion taking place.

At the end of the Flood the eight human survivors released their animal cargo onto the new earth. However, the diminished food supply on the earth, along with the new climate didn’t support a thriving dinosaur population. Dinosaurs would themselves have been hunted for food. Being a threat to human populations, violent or frightening animals would have been hunted down just as wolves and bears were hunted and extinguished from countries such as Englandby the middle ages. Legends of “dragons” survive from almost every ancient culture around the world. Some lone “monsters” have been reported around the world even in recent decades.

http://www.icr.org/article/dinosaur-next-door/

The word “dinosaur” was invented in 1841 by Sir Richard Owen. Before that, other words were used. “Dinosaur” was not found in the King James Bible because the Bible was translated over two hundred years before “dinosaur” was first used. More recent versions fail to use the word because translators and commentators were either intimidated into thinking that Darwin and his followers were right, or they just wanted to avoid controversy. However, creatures described in one or two Bible books such as Job closely resemble dinosaurs, and no other modern day animal. An animal with a tail like a cedar tree cannot logically be likened to a hippo.

Today dinosaur fossils are dug out of sedimentary rocks, sometimes in huge fossil graveyards. Swirling waters and sediments during the Flood would have collected them and dumped and buried them in one location together. There have even been finds of dinosaurs with soft tissues still in tact. Evolutionists have to think hard to explain how these tissues may have survived for over sixty-five million years in the ground. For more info on soft tissue, click these links:

http://www.icr.org/article/2033/

http://www.icr.org/soft-tissue-list/

IS GOD A TEAPOT?

I once had an interesting conversation with a woman who prided herself on being intelligent, open-minded, inclusive and tolerant - which is fine depending on our definition of those words- who told me that people should be free to believe anything they want to believe.

Up to a point I agree with her, and so does my God. So far as I can tell, we are not forcing anyone to believe anything. But the conversation didn’t end there. As is my style, I employed some rather extreme hyperbole, and asked if she thought it was alright for someone to believe that God was a teapot. She enthusiastically affirmed that people should indeed be free to worship a teapot if they so desired.

Now, I’m a tea lover. I’ve been drinking tea since I was eight years old, and there’s nothing better than having  a pot of tea, some good company and a few cookies or biscuits, depending which side of the “pond” you’re from. However, I would certainly draw a line at worshipping the teapot. Not only so, but if I were to start worshipping one, I hope that someone would come to my rescue and explain to me that a human being designed and made the pot, that it had no mind or power of its own, and that I was wasting my time. The person who would go to that trouble would be a caring one, and a true friend.

What I am saying is that some things are true, and some things are not true, no matter how much we want them to be, or think they should be. I”m also saying that we need to be pointing people in the right direction, and not be intimidated by those who say we are being “judgmental” by suggesting that worshipping a teapot is a complete waste of time.

            I recently received an email from an old friend of mine (no I’m not referring to my good mate Terence) who condescended to advise me that I needed to open my mind up. I need to take in whatever the world has to offer in the way of beliefs, philosophies, gods, and isms., because, you see, the Christian gospel is just too small and limiting. It’s too narrow and exclusive. This friend assumes that I have just not been initiated into  the cacophony of voices and the  panoply of spirituality and thought that  is available. How many times have I heard such advice! I liken this kind of reasoning to wandering around a large store, and saying “Hmm…let’s see now… I’ll have a little bit of this, and a little bit of that. Oh I quite like that, but that looks disgusting.  Hey- that’s a fantastic teapot…!”

It shouldn’t be a matter of what we like or dislike or think should be: it’s about truth and reality.

In this post-modern world where nothing is true and everything is true, (except for the Christian gospel of course), very nearly all my old friends have ascended to some higher level of thought and understanding. This understanding almost universally includes reincarnation and the feeling that everyone’s spirit  is ultimately heading in the same direction, whether they know it or not. We’re all “one” with the universe. George Lucas’ “force” is not only with us, it’s in us, around us. It is us. We’re all on some kind of a journey. Nobody really knows where or how, and nobody has anything resembling evidence: it’s all about what “must be” because, well, it just “must be”. It’s all so much bigger than we are that, well, we can’t define it or locate it. 

According to my enlightened friends, I’m missing out. I’m deficient. I’m uninitiated. I’m in the dark. I’m intolerant. I’m ignorant. I’m bigoted. I’m living in the past. I’m not evolving; in fact I’m holding back the evolution of mankind. I’m not embracing the Age of Aquarius. I’m clinging to an antiquated and disproved religion. I’m too narrow.

Well, I say Praise God for that!

My friends seem to have forgotten, or didn’t notice in the first place, that I traveled on that open, inclusive road for some time. I had the highs, the epiphanies, the hallucinations, the out of body experiences and the wild times.  I learned about the middle way and the universal consciousness. I sang and danced to George Harrison’s song in praise of Krishna. I dabbled in reincarnation. I was force-fed evolutionism at school and on TV. I believed in ghosts, and the “chariots of the gods”. Every time I went to the movies to watch “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” I wanted to climb into the screen and go up in that mother ship and never come back.

The current and politically correct consensus on belief is that all “roads” lead to the same destination, and we’re all on our own “journey” to that destination. This is very much akin to the Hindu umbrella of beliefs in which you can choose to believe in no gods, one god, ten gods, or a million gods, depending on your preference, so long as you are sincere and devoted to your path. You can worship an idol or probably a teapot if you so desire.

I do know a little about Pantheism, Pan-spermia, Polytheism, Paganism, Pan-Galactic Gargle- Blasters and some of the countless other “isms” and things beginning with “P”, and I’m aware that they do all have at least one thing in common: they’re all opposed to the gospel of Jesus Christ. Their adherents believe that the gospel “must” be wrong, because it is so narrow and exclusive. The Christian God is far too small and judgmental. The Christian “religion” is far too new. Its beliefs are too uninspiring.

How can a God who created the universe and everything in it, which itself “cannot contain him” be too small? How can a God who designed and made DNA, dinosaurs, deltas, dragonflies and diamonds be uninspiring? How can a God who knows all things be too narrow? How can a God who willingly died at the hands of his own creation in order to give them eternal life be too exclusive and too judgmental? How can a God who created time, space and matter be too new?

Mike Warnke once observed that some people are so narrow that they can see through a key-hole with both eyes. Please God deliver me from ever being that narrow.  Of course the opposite of that is being so open-minded that your brains may fall out. I’m still broad minded in the things I feel free to be broad minded in. I have far wider tastes in music, art and literature than anyone I’ve known. I’ve traveled a little: I’ve strolled around the Parthenon in Athens; I swam in the Dead Sea, the Red Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the Pacific Ocean; I’ve been to the top of the Eiffel Tower and I’ve hiked to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

But my friends are right on one thing: the gospel is narrow. In fact Jesus said it this way:

“Enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it” (Matthew 7: 13-14).

In case this was not clear enough, he also said:

“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6).

Like Christian in Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress”, I have purposely chosen the narrow way to Life. I did travel for quite some time on the broad road, and it gave me no benefit whatsoever in this world, or for the next.  I have chosen the narrow way, and having been on it for thirty one years I am still convinced I’m going the right way, while all my old friends continue on the road to destruction.

 

Previously I have written about Biblical explanations for suffering.  Today I want to touch on a subject which will immediately make some of you scoff and switch off, but will hit a nerve with others, as it does with me. It’s called “Murphy’s Law” in the U.S., “Sod’s Law” in the U.K., and doubtless there are many other synonyms around the world. Perhaps one is “Bad Luck”.

Murphy’s Law is in play when the worst and most unlikely thing that could happen in any situation does actually happen. It’s an attack of spite from some unseen source. It’s a kind of living irony which seems to have a personal vendetta against you. I’ll give a few examples:

 -It seems that all the traffic lights turn red as you approach them, but only when you’re short of time. When you have time to spare, they will be green;

-No matter which line you get into at the bank or the store, it always seems to be the wrong one, because the person at the front has an apparently unsolvable issue. If you change lines, the same thing happens in that one;

-You bet on a horse, but at the last minute change your bet on a whim, only to find that the horse you first chose wins the race;

-The week on which your lottery numbers win the day is the same week that you forgot to buy a ticket;

-You drop your toast onto the floor, and it falls butter or jam side down onto the rug. This was one that I first observed with amazement many years ago, and then one day on the net I stumbled upon “Jennings Corollary”. This obviously brilliant man, and a man after my own heart, observed that “The chances of the toast falling buttered side down are in direct proportion to the cost of the carpet”.

 - One personal example from my point of view is that within a year of this article, some Christian celebrity will be interviewed on radio or TV to promote his or her new and remarkably insightful book on Murphy’s Law and the Bible. The gloves are off in all sections of society these days.

THE PARADOX OF TOAST AND JAM

The scientifically minded among will be quick to argue that the toast and jam problem is simply a case of gravity acting upon the jammy side of the toast which is heavier. There’s no doubt in my mind, after extensive and elaborate scientific experiments under lab conditions, that gravity does affect the outcome of the event by operating on the jammy side more often than the dry side. The value of the rug is not a variant here because I used a hard surface which was easy to clean. If I had used the carpet I would have had some serious explaining to do to my wife.

Out of 100 falls from a ceramic plate at the height of four feet (apologies to all you metrics fans) onto a level surface, I found that the toast landed jam side down sixty-three times and dry side down thirty-seven times.  But here lies one of the problems with Murphy’s Law: it is mysteriously negated by laboratory conditions! Under normal circumstances the toast will fall jam side down every time for some of us! The flow of events which occur to many of us in normal life will be totally absent when observed with an eye to gaining solid evidence of our Law’s existence. And paradoxically, herein lies hope for all of us who feel the heavy hand of Murphy’s Law: we only need to make the effort to observe and record those seemingly impossible coincidences and they will vanish! They will not occur any more often than they would if the strictest naturalist conducted experiments and filmed them for National Geographic. Abracadabra – we are free of Murphy’s Law!

Now please don’t think that I’m being frivolous here, because in my view our inability to study the Law in any scientific way actually serves to point us in the direction of an explanation for it! We have Murphy’s Law cornered!

POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS

There are a few different possible causes for the Law to be in operation. One is that we have made a bad choice and are reaping the consequences. If we go the wrong way down a one-way street there is the chance of being caught by a police officer. Plenty of people drive the wrong way and get away with it, but for the few that get spotted by a police officer, there may be the temptation to believe that they have been singled out by some malevolent unseen power. In a case like this, what we believe to be bad luck is simply the result of our own mistakes or failure. The law of averages ensures that some people get caught sooner or later.

One common cause could be simple carelessnes. We dropped the toast because we were sloppy and in a hurry, and gravity did the rest.

Another explanation is faulty perception. If we leave home late to get to work, the traffic lights will seem to be against us, even though they are not or may not be.

Another is that little furry Gremlins are always one step ahead of us, waiting to change those lights when they see us approaching, confusing the person at the front of the line and making the regiter or computer freeze, and conveying the jammy side of the toast to its least desirable resting place.

Still another is coincidence. There has to be true coincidence in a physical world, and when that coincidence occurs we are sometimes amazed and start to imagine all kinds of paranormal explanations or “omens”. There are those who believe there is no such thing as coincidence. Even in the Christian world some teach this. It is true that Solomon said “The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord” (Proverbs 16:33). However, it seems like an illegitimate extrapolation to then assume that every event in the physical universe is caused by God. If this is the case, we really don’t have free will or minds of our own, and two cars will collide with terrible results because God just thought they should..  This doesn’t make sense, Biblically, to me. I think we have real decisions to make, I think that there are real consequences, and I think that there are genuine coincidences.

THE SPIRITUAL DIMENSION

Any one of these possible explanations plus others I haven’t mentioned can be applied depending on the situation, but one more  important possibility to consider is that there is sometimes a spiritual dimension to events, and that some (not all) events and outcomes are arranged by forces beyond our control. In the Bible we can find several examples of that spiritual dimension causing apparently unlikely things to happen, as well as examples of events which we may normally ascribe to Murphy’s Law, but which in fact have a natural cause. Let’s look at some of those events and try to identify the cause of each one.

-The story of Jonah being swallowed by a large fish is quite well known, but we don’t often consider the plant, a vine, near the end of the story (Jonah 4:5). Jonah, the “reluctant prophet”, was suffering from the heat of the sun as he overlooked Ninevah, hoping that God was going to fry it (he was disappointed).. So God caused a vine to grow suddenly, providing welcome shade. The very next day, a worm chewed on the vine to the point that the vine withered. Jonah was angry, and complained to the Lord. He may well have regarded this as “Murphy’s Law” in operation, had he known that term, because judging by his anger this was to him the worst and most unlikely turn of events. We are given the benefit of knowing that it was God who sent the worm to chew on the vine, in order to provide a life-lesson to Jonah. The Lord pointed out that all Jonah cared about was himself, and not the many thousands of people who lived in Nineveh.

-Ahab was a wicked King of Israel. After many years of his tyrannical reign with Jezebel, a prophet of the Lord warned Ahab that he was going to die in the upcoming battle against the Arameans (1 Kings 22). Although Ahab had rejected the warning of the prophet, on the day he decided to enter the battle in disguise, thinking that this would allow him to escape his fate. However, we are told that “someone drew his bow at random and hit the king of Israel between the sections of his armor” (verse 34). The message for us here is undoubtedly that God’s will, or his knowledge of the future, always gets fulfilled one way or another. But if we look at it from Ahab’s point of view as he lay bleeding to death in his chariot, or from the view of his charioteer, this may have just seemed like a case of terrible “luck” or Murphy’s Law.

-Saul was another King of Israel who failed to obey God. Consequently, the Lord sent an evil spirit to torment him (1 Samuel 16:14).  What did this “tormenting” entail? It’s difficult to be clear on what this evil spirit did to him, but there are a few clues. It affected Saul’s mood (v 16 and 23), and it made him angry and violent (18: 10 and 19: 9-10). He became very jealous (18:6-9). I mustn’t assert this too strongly, but my feeling has always been that at this time nothing went “right” for Saul. I would say that his toast fell jam side down every morning and he was grumpy for the rest of the day. The traffic lights were red for him at every junction, his horse lost every race, and the lot was always against him.

-Jephthah was a mighty warrior and a commander of the Israelites against the Ammonites. He made a vow in the heat of the moment to the Lord that if the ensuing battle went his way, he would sacrifice the first thing or person that came out of his house to greet him upon his return home. The battle indeed went his way, but who should be the first to exit the house to greet him but his only daughter. Of course he was “devastated” as we might say now.

I will note three important things here. First, the Lord did not request or require the vow, it was Jephthah’s foolish idea from start to finish. Secondly, it’s wrong to make a vow to the Lord and not keep it, so it’s best to not make the vow at all (Matthew 5:34). Jephthah should have known that. Thirdly, when the stupidity of his vow became clear to him, he should have taken the rap himself instead of inflicting it on his virgin daughter.

That being said, imagine how he felt when, upon his return home his one precious daughter appeared from the house. If he thought it through at all, he had probably expected a servant (which would be bad enough), or a goat or a dog, or perhaps even his wife. Instead the light of his life was the “unlucky” one. Had he known of Murphy’s Law, might he not have put his misfortune down to that?

-A company of prophets with Elisha went to build a new crash pad for themselves. As they chopped at the trees, one man’s axe head fell off the handle and into some water. It seemed to the man that it was lost, and he was pretty upset because the axe head was borrowed. In those days it wasn’t easy to go down to the local Lowe’s hardware superstore and get another one. “Murphy’s Law”, some might say in such circumstances. Fortunately for the young prophet, Elisha was able to exercise God’s miracle working power to retrieve the axe head (2 Kings 6: 1-7). This seems to have been one of many opportunities for the Spirit of God to display his power among the prophets ofIsrael.

-In the New Testament, Jesus cast a legion of demons out of a man. As requested, they were given leave to enter a nearby herd of pigs, since they obviously wanted to be in a body of some kind rather than go to the Abyss. Once there, the pigs ran down a steep slope into some water and drowned (Luke 8:26-39).

This was a notable miracle which was the talk of the whole region in a very short space of time, but the thing I want to focus on is the view of the whole event from the perspective of the owners of the herd.. Since this region of the land was predominantly Gentile, we can’t make the assertion that Jesus was targeting Jews for owning swine, which would have been unlawful. But even if they were not Jews, we can imagine that they felt victimized. Why had their animals, of all that were in the area, been the ones who were killed by some unpredictable and undeserved event? Would not they have seen this as something akin to Murphy’s Law in action?

-Also in Luke’s gospel, Jesus speaks of a recent event in which a tower had collapsed, killing eighteen people. He wanted his audience to understand that the eighteen had not been singled out from the population to suffer a fatal accident because they were more guilty of sin than anyone else (Luke 13: 4-5). It seems that perhaps that’s what they were thinking. To many people, particularly those who were at all superstitious, the event would have seemed like a bad case of Murphy’s Law. “Why me?” we often hear people say when something bad happens to them. Perhaps we’ve all had that thought at some time in our lives.

-Paul, the great evangelist and apologist of the first century, was inflicted with an ongoing illness (2 Corinthians 12:7-10). The most common view is that he had an eye disorder. He called the infliction a “thorn in the flesh”, in other words, a constant irritant and handicap. He said that God had sent “a messenger of Satan” to torment him with the illness. He recognized that it was sent to keep him humble (verse 7). The disorder likely affected how people thought of him. Some people thought that he was “unimpressive, and his speaking amounts to nothing” (10:10). As an evangelist and a public speaker, people generally want to be as impressive as possible. How would you feel if, as a public speaker, you developed a visually unattractive and debilitating condition? Might you not see it as “Murphy’s Law” at work?

-Joseph, having escaped the desire of some of his brothers to murder him, landed a great job as the manager of a wealthy man’s house (Genesis 39). How must he have felt, when the lady of the house falsly accused him of attempted rape, causing him to be thrown into prison for at least two years? For many of us, this would be Murphy’s Law: the worst and most unfair turn of events possible.

-Solomon observed that it was unwise to speak or even think evil of dignitaries, because your words or thoughts czn mysteriously make their way to those very dignitaries (Ecclesiastes 10:20). We may consider it very bad luck if, having whispered or even thought bad things about someone, they discover what you have said. How could such a thing happen? It does: I’ve seen it happen in my own life.

- Job, a righteous man, was tested beyond measure when Satan decided that God had made things too easy for him, which was the only reason, he contended, that Job was a Godly man (see the book of Job, particularly chapters 1 and 2). God allowed Satan to inflict some terrible disasters on Job in order to reveal the real condition of his heart. Incredibly, Job resorted to praising God anyway (1: 20-22 and 2:9-10). However, he did believe that his suffering was arbitrarily imposed on him. He seemed to have no awareness of Satan, or of the contest for his soul and his reputation in heaven as outlined in the first two chapters. It was all a huge case of “Murphy’s Law”. The most unfair sequence of events had fallen on him, apparently without any good reason. At the end of Job’s story, we find God putting Job right on a few things. We don’t have the benefit of being audibly told our faults by the Lord. Perhaps he reveals them to us in other ways, or perhaps we make the mistake of deciding that a case of Murphy’s Law has befallen us, and never come to search for the reason why.LESSONS FOR US

Some of these examples simply demonstrate indiscretion. None of them speak of natural coincidence. Some of them speak of directed spiritual influence designed to fulfill the will of God. All of them could be construed as “bad luck” or “Murphy’s Law by the apparent victim or an observer. So what is the lesson for us?

We all need to be very careful to avoid reading things into events and circumstances in our lives. They may most often be due to our own faulty decisions or actions or those of other people, or natural laws such as gravity or coincidence.  But at the same time, there may be times when God is trying to tell us something or teach us something. On rare occasions what we might perceive to be the Law is being administered by God, or angels – good or fallen, although they are under the ultimate control of the Almighty..We are perhaps being tested to find the condition of our hearts (see my article on suffering and testing). Murphy’s Law can be very frustrating: are we going to humble ourselves as Paul did, or rise up in pride and anger as Saul did? We may find that the Lord is opposing us because of our attitudes and our course in life. “The Lord works out everything for his own ends – even the wicked for the day of disaster” (Proverbs 16:4).

Whatever happens, we must at all costs avoid blaming “nature” or “luck” of evil or wrongdoing, because this is essentially accusing God of evil or wrongdoing, since God is in ultimate control of nature and luck.  Instead, we must praise God in all circumstances (1 Thessalonians 5:18).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.